🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.