🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, however, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a invented security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” the nation from chaos. While the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. A new film inspired by a popular book aims to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The presidency was in essence a casting call with many candidates. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the country de facto.

• His list featured several politicians, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who researched his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A businessman close to the process said the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's arrival as James Bond. The grittier version prompted Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by viewers there, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. His influence is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it perhaps aims to question.